Drude-Lorentz Theory of
Dielectric Constant and speed of light in solids
The equation of motion for an electron that is bound by a simple
spring of spring constant k is
|
|
(1.1)
|
where m is the mass, b is the drag coefficient, and e is the
electron charge.
This equation is most easily solved by converting to a complex
number format where E(t) and x(t) are the real parts of
|
|
(1.2)
|
Then equation 1 becomes:
|
|
(1.3)
|
or solving for x0:
|
|
(1.4)
|
Equation 2 is usually written in the form:
|
|
(1.5)
|
where
|
|
(1.6)
|
The real part of the equation 3 is:
|
|
(1.7)
|
In a relatively transparent medium, . Also for the purposes of this document, we
will assume that which means that the electric field frequency
is not near any absorption resonances of the nearly transparent medium. Then equation 4 becomes:
|
|
(1.8)
|
which is the expression for x0 in a static electric field. This just means that the electron experiences
no delay in following the electric field.
The
dipole moment associated with a single electron is then
|
|
(1.9)
|
If there are n such electrons per
unit volume then the polarization, P, per unit volume is:
|
|
(1.10)
|
In SI units, the expression for
the displacement field, D, in terms of E and/or P is:
|
|
(1.11)
|
But using expression 5 we have:
|
|
(1.12)
|
which also has units of
polarization per unit volume and
which indicates that
|
|
(1.13)
|
where
|
|
(1.14)
|
Since k is expressed in Newtons
(kg-meter/sec2) per meter, the above expression has units
|
|
(1.15)
|
where C is coulombs, s is seconds, m is kg, and L is meters.
The units of ε0 are also as seen in http://www.ebyte.it/library/educards/sidimensions/SiDimensionsAlfaList.html#f
Therefore, ε1 has the same units as ε0.
One might want to know what is the quotient n/ω02
to make ε1=ε0?
|
|
(1.16)
|
Thus ε1 is to be compared with ε0
which is the polarizability of free space.
The speed of light in the medium is proportional to
|
|
(1.17)
|
where m0 is the magnetic permeability and is not
an important variable in most transparent media.
Therefore higher dipole density and lower resonant frequency
tend to reduce the speed of light.
Alternatively, if the electron charge were increased and the electron
mass decreased, then the speed would also be reduced.
Note that ε1μ0
has the units: (Where A=Amps, sec=seconds, m=meters kg=kilograms)
|
|
(1.18)
|
where the units of μ0
are Newtons A-2.
In comparison to shear waves in solids which have speed:
|
|
(1.19)
|
where E is the stiffness (Newton/m2) , ρ is the mass density (kg/m2), and ν the Poisson ratio. In the limit that
e1>>e0, the equivalent of the stiffness to density ratio is
|
|
(1.20)
|
On the right hand side, the electron mass density is:
thus:
|
|
(1.21)
|
and therefore the shear stiffness G=E/(2(1+ν))
corresponds to
|
|
(1.22)
|
where w02 =k/m and k is the spring
constant (N/m) of the bound electron.
The units of μ0 are Newton/Amp2
and therefore the units of the denominator are N-sec2
And the overall units of Gequiv are
|
|
(1.23)
|
as expected.
Note from the calculation below that the electromagnetic
“stiffness” is ~1015 Nt/m2 compared to the typical 2x1011
N/m2 stiffness of steel. In
addition, the electron mass density is small, on the order of 10-2
kg m-3 versus 104 kg m-3 for steel. The ratio of the speed of light in solids to
the speed of sound in solids is of the order of 2e8/2e3=1e5 as expected from
the above quantities.
Another way to view the effect of ε1
on the speed of light in a solid is to assign fictitious electrons with
fictitious density, nv, and fictitious spring constant, kv,
to all of vacuum and thereby create a fraction with the same value as ε0
|
|
(1.24)
|
where nv/kv is of the same order of
magnitude as ns/ks.
The consequence of this is, in the solid, that the spring
constant assigned to vacuum acts in series
(rather than in parallel) with the spring constant assigned to the electrons
thereby reducing the combined stiffness and thereby reducing the speed of light
in the solid. Also note that the speed
in the solid is reduced whether ε1 exceeds ε0
or otherwise.