Gas Centrifuge
Introduction
The gas
centrifuge provides a good framework for learning Newtonian and thermal physics
of a large ensemble of particles (usually molecules or atoms). In this document I will first give the
standard macroscopic Boltzmann treatment of the radial distribution of
particles of different mass. Then I will
document on a more microscopic basis the dynamics of how the radial
distribution is achieved. Finally I show
the mathematics of the velocity changes when two particles of different mass
and arbitrary velocities collide.
Figures
Figure 1: Diagram of the animation with heavy particle
speed at Mach 1.8. Note that the
particle density is much more dense at the outer radius than the inner
radius. Also note that the radial
probabilities and radial bin counts are reasonably well matched except for the
expected variances due to only 600 particles and therefore an average of only 1
particles in each of the 40 bins polled.
Average Radial Particle Distribution in an
Artificial Gravity
1. Standard Thermal Physics Treatment
The
Boltzmann probability law for particle height, in a gravity (or acceleration
field), g, is:
(1)
where N is a normalization constant, m is the mass of the
particle, k is Boltzmann's constant, h is the height of the particle with
respect to the center of the gravitational field, and T is absolute
temperature. It will be adequate to
model g as
(2)
where ω is the rate of rotation (radians per second)
and r is somewhere between the inner radius, rI, and outer radius, rO
. Note that the sign of g is negative
since the acceleration is toward the axis of the centrifuge.
Then equation 1 becomes
(3)
Equation 3 is the time-averaged particle density Vs mass and
radius distribution in the annulus of the centrifuge. Note that the quantity in
the numerator of the exponent of equation 3 is just mvt2(r)
where vt(r) is the average tangential speed of the
particle. The speed of sound in an ideal
gas is:
where γ is the ratio of specific heat at constant
pressure to that at constant volume and is usually of order unity (for air γ=7/5). Thus equation 3 can be converted to the
simpler form:
(3a)
where Mm=vt/vs is the Mach
number associated with the particular gas.
Note that the heavier gas will have a lower Mach number than the lighter
gas. Also note that the movement of the
gas from being uniformly distributed to being higher density at the outer
radius of the centrifuge doesn't become significant at Mach numbers less than about1.0.
2. Microscopic Treatment
a. Providing Centripetal
Acceleration
Equations 3
are just formalisms and don't explain on a microscopic basis how this radial distribution
is achieved and maintained. It is clear
that the centripetal force needed to keep individual particles rotating in an
approximate circle about the axis of the centrifuge has to come from their
collisions with the outer boundary.
Obviously the average rate of radial momentum transfer must be sufficient
to provide the acceleration described in equation 2:
(4)
where <r> represents the average value of r. If wall collisions are separated in time by a
representative time, τ, then we can say that for any one
collision we must have:
(5)
and the difference in the radial speed changes is:
(6)
Equation 6 seems to be independent of the mass of the atoms
but doesn't take into account the difference in thermal speeds between atoms of
different mass. Since the less massive
atoms move faster, they will collide more times per second with the outer wall
and gain more inward speed.
The number
of wall collisions per second per wall unit area is
(7)
where n is the number of molecules per unit volume and <vth>
is the average thermal velocity of the molecules. In order to keep the entire volume, V, of the
gas moving in a circle, the inward momentum supplied by the entire area, A, of
the outer boundary is
(8)
where Δp is the average momentum provided per
collision, rO is the outer radius and rI is the inner
radius and <r> is the mean radial location of the molecules. If the axial length of the centrifuge is L
then:
(9)
When equations 7 and 9 are inserted into equation 8 we have:
(10)
Solving equation 10 for Δp we have:
(11)
For low Mach numbers we can assume that <r>=(rO+rI)/2
and we know from thermal physics that
(12)
so that equation 11 becomes:
(13)
where vt is the average tangential speed due to
the centrifuge rotation and vth is the average thermal speed. Dividing
both sides of equation 13 by m we get the inward speed change Δv needed
at each outer wall collision to keep the gas moving in a circle:
(14)
Note that equation 14 has units of speed as it must.
b. Bringing Particles up to the Tangential Speed of the Centrifuge
The
previous section computes the inward radial speed increments needed for each
wall collision in order to keep the molecules moving in approximate circles
about the centrifuge axis. This section will deal with accelerating the gas so
that it finally has the same rotational speed as the centrifuge. It's clear that inelastic collisions with the
walls of the centrifuge are the only way that the gas can be accelerated. In order for the entire gas to be accelerated
tangentially at rate α=dω/dt, we must have a certain change in angular
momentum, ΔP, at each collision. The angular momentum equation is:
where the moment of inertia, I, is implicitly defined as the
total gas mass times the average radius squared. Following the previous section we have the
total number of wall collisions per second as:
dividing the two equations we obtain
The tangential speed change for each collision can be
computed from the following equation:
so that
The way that the tangential speed is implemented in the
program is to add the value
to the tangential speed at each inner or outer wall
collision. Using this expression, the
tangential speed of the atoms exponentially approaches the tangential speed of
the outer wall of the centrifuge.
Particle-Particle Collisions of Different Mass or Velocity
Here we
will consider spherical particles which have the different masses, m1
and m2, and diameter, D. The
centers of the spheres will be labeled (x1,y1) and (x2,y2). Upon collision, the momentum transferred
between the spheres will always be along the unit vector:
(19)
where
is the distance between centers. Since the animation is illustrated in only 2
dimensions, we will simplify the analysis by doing it in 2 dimensions. The vector analysis in 3 dimensions is
entirely similar except all velocities and positions have a z component.
The expression for the final momenta in terms of the initial
momenta is:
(20)
where the apostrophe on the left side of the equations
indicates the final velocities. We know
that the energies are conserved so
(21)
The directions of the change in momenta are along the vector
of centers, u, and the values of the
changes of momenta must be equal and opposite.
(22)
so that
(23)
Now we can use equation 23 in equation 21 to solve for the
value of Mδv.
(24)
where the large dot stands for the dot product and equation
24 simplifies to:
(25)
where we make the identification:
and M is known as the "reduced mass".
Equations 23 and 25 are a complete solution for the final momenta.
The final velocities are computed by dividing both sides of equations 23 by
their respective masses:
Suppose m2>m1. Then we see that the magnitude of the speed
added to molecule 1 will be larger than the magnitude of the speed removed from molecule 2. We can easily see from equation 24 that, even
though the averages of the dot products are zero, that the collision results in an increased
kinetic energy for molecule 1 and a decreased kinetic energy for molecule 2
because of the mass term in the denominators.
If the initial speeds are the same then the only difference
between E1 and E2 is due to the M2 term in the
kinetic energies.
If the speeds are different, say v2>v1,
but the masses are the same, then the difference in kinetic energies is due to
the Mm term in the kinetic energies:
The above equation can be re-written:
where
is the cosine of the angle between vi and u. The average value over all possible angles
between vi and u of the cosine squared terms is 1/2 so
we can write
Therefore, averaged over all possible angles between u and v,
the change of kinetic energy for particle 1 will be positive since v2>v1.
This degradation of the energy of the larger mass or higher
speed atoms and/or speed leads to what is called the zeroth law of
thermodynamics-all energies tend to be become equalized because of collisions. An example of this would be two gases of
different molecular masses as well as different temperatures injected into an
insulated box. The gas temperatures (or
average energies) will equalize leaving the average speed of the gas with more
massive molecules less than that of the gas with less massive molecules but the
energies will tend to become equal due to the energy Vs velocity law we just
proved.
Let's compute the E1 and E2 for the
general case where both m and v are different.
Inserting the expression for Mδv
we have:
It's clear
that, over many collisions, the (u.v1)(u.v2) terms
average to zero.
Since the
animation is digital we can expect that most often the collision condition will
be realized when the distance between the centers of the two spheres,r12,
is less than D. To handle this I
will increase the distance between the centers by the difference
by shifting each sphere in opposite directions by dr/2 along
u.
Thus we will move the centers by the vectors:
(26)